Beyond Coding

How do you prove AI is shipping more features? Amos Haviv leads the Developer Workflow teams at Booking.com, supporting 4000 engineers operating 8000 repos. Everybody is burning through their AI budget right now and almost nobody can answer what it bought them. Amos can, because his team spent four years building an event system to debug their own SDLC before AI upped the urgency. In this video, we cover: Why verification is the bottleneck right now, and where it moves next Building an event store that separates KTLO from real feature delivery Why static dashboards create the metric they measure, and the cobra story behind it Agent cost, model routing, and why Booking ignores token maxing entirely Running a developer survey with a 92% response rate across 3k+ engineers Who should own skills and MCPs: a central platform team or the domain experts? For platform engineers, engineering leaders, and anyone being asked to prove ROI on AI tooling this quarter. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Everyone is burning through their budget 00:00:32 - Verification Is the Bottleneck Every Team Hit 00:03:35 - 4,000 Engineers and 8,000 Repos at Booking.com 00:06:48 - Why Copying Google and OpenAI Will Break You 00:09:21 - Verification Is a Stack of Agents, Not One Review 00:13:27 - Cost Is Becoming a Bottleneck of Its Own 00:17:14 - Was the Internet a Bubble? What That Teaches Us 00:25:32 - What Working With the Frontier Labs Looks Like 00:28:26 - Debugging the SDLC With Four Years of Event Data 00:30:24 - Do Engineers Using AI Actually Ship More Features? 00:37:13 - Where to Start If You Measure Nothing Today 00:45:01 - The Cobra Effect: When a Metric Becomes a Target 00:52:23 - Everyone Is a Builder Now, and Everything Needs Support 01:01:21 - Is AI Turning Every Engineer Into a Manager? 01:03:46 - The Developer Survey With a 92% Response Rate 01:10:09 - Who Owns Skills, MCPs, and the Enterprise Harness 01:17:46 - Great Developer Experience Is High Velocity Mentioned in the episode: High Output Management by Andy Grove The Sovereign Individual (1997) The story of General Magic Views expressed are Amos's own and do not represent Booking.com. #AI #SoftwareEngineering #DeveloperExperience

"I need to stop using Opus. This doesn't work." That was Heitor Lessa's conclusion after a refactor cost him 200 million tokens, and it forced him to rebuild the entire agent workflow now available for 1400 engineers. Heitor spent 11 years at AWS, built Lambda Powertools to 230 billion API calls a week, and in this episode he walks through the full SDLC workflow on screen, from discovery to merge check. In this episode, we cover: The product loop: discovery, whiteboarding, and the /roadmap command Spec-driven development with Open Spec and why vanilla setups fail Three model tiers: SOTA for planning, mid-tier for implementation, cheap models for reviews Merge checks with adversarial reviewers and attestations that catch agents fabricating test results The /retro command: using the Socratic method to make your workflow more deterministic If you're an engineer figuring out how to work with agents at team scale without losing trust in your codebase, this is the workflow to steal. This is also the first Beyond Coding episode with visuals on screen, so let me know what you think of the format. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - The Math Doesn't Add Up 00:00:43 - Amazon Hypergrowth: 11 Years, 8 Different Roles 00:03:29 - Learning From the Trenches as a Technical Account Manager 00:08:38 - Developer Identity and the Birth of Lambda Powertools 00:10:20 - The Hard Parts of Working in Public 00:13:12 - How Powertools Hit 230 Billion API Calls a Week 00:16:42 - Career Advice: Learn Adjacent Roles, Not More Tech 00:19:37 - When Leadership Decisions Don't Make Sense to You 00:23:21 - The Product Loop Starts With Discovery 00:25:22 - From Whiteboard to /roadmap 00:27:37 - Why Humans Plan First and Agents Come Second 00:30:33 - Commands vs Skills Across 32 Different Models 00:33:38 - Adversarial Reviewers on Every Plan 00:36:07 - The Socratic Method, Explained 00:40:29 - Why He Only Takes Paper Notes 00:44:43 - The Five-Line Paper Trick for High-Stakes Meetings 00:48:18 - /new-work: Capturing Scope Creep Without Derailing 00:54:03 - The Dev Loop Begins: Open Spec Explore 00:56:34 - Three Model Tiers: SOTA, Mid, Cheap 00:57:43 - The $5,000/Month Per Engineer Question 00:58:57 - Guardrails vs Autonomy for 1,400 Engineers 01:04:22 - Auto-Sizer: Does This Task Even Need a Spec? 01:07:26 - Decision Fatigue and Why Frameworks Win 01:09:10 - The Plan Phase: Specs, Design, Formal Verification 01:13:07 - The Refactor That Cost 200 Million Tokens 01:15:11 - When Agents Forge Evidence They Ran Your Tests 01:17:27 - Local-First Architecture Explained 01:23:04 - The Apply Phase: Fully Autonomous Loops 01:24:30 - Coding Was Never the Bottleneck 01:26:39 - Why This Workflow Is an Investment 01:27:39 - Decision Logs and the /onboarding Command 01:29:06 - Running Agents Locally With Enterprise Governance 01:32:42 - Hooks: Making Quality Gates Deterministic 01:36:02 - Merge Checks: 15 Adversarial Reviewers Per Change 01:38:30 - /retro: Interviewing Yourself to Improve the Loop 01:43:12 - Trust, Loss of Trust, and Recovery With Agents 01:48:02 - Experience, Scars, and Critical Thinking 01:49:32 - Why Right Now Is the Time to Experiment 01:52:04 - Conviction Comes From Being in the Loop #softwareengineering #aiagents #aws

What senior engineers do differently has less to do with output than most career ladders suggest, and Lindsey Simon, VP of Engineering at Vercel, has watched the distinction sharpen as everyone in the valley becomes a "member of technical staff." From why new grads with hackathon years might out-prepare engineers with six years on the job, to what happens when PR throughput stops being your lever, this is a conversation about what earns seniority now. In this episode, we cover: Why engineering roles are consolidating into "member of technical staff" How to ask agents first and frame better questions to humans The scope-of-impact ladder and what the best engineers systematize Learning how to learn: closing gaps to 100% understanding Why writing is the skill that scales If you're wondering whether your years of experience still compound, or you're early-career and tired of the "woe is the juniors" narrative, this one reframes both. TIMESTAMPS 00:00:00 - Impact the Business 00:00:31 - FOMO all the time: The 2006 Google Interview 00:01:52 - Engineering Roles Are Consolidating 00:02:52 - The "Member of Technical Staff" trend in SF 00:03:33 - Interns Demo to the CTO 00:04:33 - How New Grads Out-Prepare Senior Engineers 00:06:10 - Ask Your Agent Before You Ask a Human 00:08:01 - Digging Backwards Into Fundamental Understanding 00:09:22 - "We're All Junior Engineers Again" 00:10:22 - Management Is Not Leadership 00:12:04 - Losing PR Throughput as Your #1 Lever 00:13:11 - Fulfillment Beyond Shipping Features 00:14:32 - Building for Fickle Engineers: Telemetry Beats Opinions 00:16:11 - Watching Users Struggle With Your Product 00:18:12 - Have Expectations for Seniors Actually Changed? 00:19:57 - Claude Says a Month, It Takes Two Hours 00:20:33 - What the Best Engineers Do Differently 00:21:30 - How Vercel React Skill Came to Be 00:22:23 - Why Conference Conversations Hit Different 00:23:35 - Learning How to Learn: Close Gaps to 100% 00:25:41 - The Case for Liberal Arts in Tech 00:27:03 - Get Feedback Early, Don't Hide in the Cave Guest - Lindsey Simon, VP of Engineering at Vercel: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lindseysimon #softwareengineering #ai #careergrowth

The fastest engineers are falling behind, and Kitze was one of them. He built his reputation on raw coding speed, then realized his coding wasn't competing with anyone's coding anymore, it was competing with their setups. Wake-up call for developers: Kitze now runs 140 projects solo with agent loops, and in this episode he breaks down what separates the engineers pulling ahead from the ones getting left behind. In this episode, we cover: Vibe coding vs vibe engineering, and how to get better results from your agents Police files: Self-correcting loops that end every agent turn with zero errors Why teams of 10 are collapsing into teams of 2, and who survives The rude awakening coming for engineers who refuse to adapt The number one advice to stay on track and fight FOMO For individual contributors, tech leads, and principal engineers who don't plan on falling behind TIMESTAMPS: 00:00:00 - Intro 00:00:40 - Vibe Coding vs Vibe Engineering: The Real Difference 00:02:16 - Police Files: The Self-Correcting Loop on Every Turn 00:05:23 - Capture Every Frustration as a Rule 00:06:53 - Why Being the Fastest Coder Stopped Mattering 00:09:45 - Problem Solver vs Problem Lover: Pick One 00:10:43 - The Rude Awakening Engineers Don't Want 00:12:05 - Why Teams of 10 Become Teams of 2 00:13:09 - Loop Engineering: The Edge Anyone Can Build 00:16:08 - Why No Agent Orchestrator Works Yet 00:17:07 - Starting a Fresh Codebase: What Kitze Transfers 00:19:14 - No Sidebars: Inventing an Agentic OS 00:21:07 - How Kitze Shipped 300 Changes Across 200 Repos 00:23:40 - We Are Becoming the Bottleneck 00:24:25 - Why Leadership Must Give Engineers Room to Experiment 00:26:16 - The Token Divide: Not Everyone Can Compete 00:27:41 - Learn Now or Lose Access Later 00:29:33 - The Culling: Coasting Is Going Away 00:30:45 - Why LLM Code Reviews Beat Tired Seniors 00:33:21 - Solo Engineers With Agent Swarms vs Teams 00:34:53 - Agents Climbing the Org Chart to CEO 00:36:03 - What Distinguishes the Best Engineers: Unblocking 00:36:50 - Ego Is the Real Bottleneck 00:37:55 - Kitze's #1 Advice: Stick to One Model

Danila Shtan runs engineering at Nebius, one of the biggest AI clouds in the world, and he told me exactly which engineers he hires on the spot. There are only hundreds of people on the planet with the skill he wants most, and it is not the one you are grinding on. We get into which engineering skills are actually scarce and well paid today, and which ones are quietly on the way out. In this episode we cover: The engineering skills in highest demand right now and which ones are on the way out Why an AI cloud CTO restricts Claude Code inside his own company Dan's rule for merging any AI-written code into production Why working with an agent is like managing a junior engineer The interview question that surfaces top tier engineer qualities Why he still runs algorithm interviews today If you are an engineer trying to work out where the value sits now that agents write the easy code, this is a straight answer from the person building the infrastructure underneath all of it. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - AI Agents doing everything is a lie 00:00:44 - What Nebius Actually Does 00:04:31 - The Engineers In Highest Demand Right Now 00:06:58 - Inside the Hiring Process 00:08:12 - The Bootcamp: You Join the Company, Not a Team 00:10:51 - Why You Can't Use AI in Their Interviews 00:16:31 - Why He Banned the Word "Headcount" 00:22:25 - Why a CTO Is Not a Technical Role 00:24:49 - The One Skill Every Manager Needs 00:25:48 - Why Smart People Fail at This 00:28:17 - "The Promise of Agents Is Bullshit" 00:31:39 - How AI Multiplies Your Baseline Skill 00:35:32 - Why an AI Agent Is Just a Junior Engineer 00:36:57 - Why He Won't Let His Team Use Claude Code 00:37:46 - His Rule for Merging AI-Written Code 00:40:28 - The Interview That Predicts Great Engineers 00:42:32 - From T-Shaped to Round-Shaped Engineers 00:44:30 - Is There Still a Path for Juniors? 00:45:28 - Why Hard Skills No Longer Matter 00:47:11 - The Engineers Who Will Become Obsolete 00:50:04 - The Real Reason People Stay at Banks 00:52:26 - Where AI Agents Actually Help 00:54:40 - Why He Still Uses Algorithm Interviews 00:56:05 - Tech Enthusiasts vs. Real Engineers #AIEngineering #TechCareers #SoftwareEngineering

120,000 tech workers have been laid off in 2026, yet there are 60,000 open roles. Engineers applying are sending out 100 applications for zero replies. Former Reddit, Uber and Disney Plus recruiter Keki Mwaba breaks down why the market broke, why every resume now looks identical, and what gets you hired when yours looks like everyone else's. In this video, we cover: Why 120,000 layoffs and 60,000 open roles don't add up Why CVs have become too good and it's no longer enough How to treat LinkedIn as a platform Getting into companies like OpenAI and Anthropic How to reach out to people without seeming fake If you're a software engineer trying to stand out in the most competitive tech market in years, this is the playbook. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Intro 00:00:35 - How bad is the tech job market in 2026? 00:02:38 - 120,000 laid off, 60,000 jobs open: the math is not mathing 00:04:05 - LinkedIn isn't a CV, it's a platform 00:08:30 - The underrated move: comment your way into a job 00:10:48 - Is AI ruining LinkedIn? 00:13:50 - Never feel safe: how to prepare before a layoff 00:15:34 - What layoffs do to the people who stay 00:17:03 - "Did I just automate myself out of a job?" 00:18:48 - Why every resume now looks the same 00:20:11 - Why referrals beat applications 00:22:13 - Do software engineers still have a future? 00:23:32 - The staff engineer who wants to quit for plumbing 00:26:16 - Patrick on his own job security 00:30:21 - 70% of job descriptions now demand AI skills 00:31:34 - Is middle management disappearing? 00:33:53 - The impossible ask: stay current, deliver, and not burn out 00:37:02 - How to get hired at OpenAI or Anthropic 00:39:18 - How to message someone without seeming fake 00:41:42 - Build a portfolio that shows your thinking 00:45:12 - Your personal branding plan for the next few weeks Guest: Keki Mwaba, career and recruitment expert: https://www.linkedin.com/in/keki-mwaba #techjobs #softwareengineering #careeradvice

Jeroen Gordijn and Jeroen Dee: two frontrunners who stopped writing code months ago and say software development is already solved. Typing code is no longer necessary, but what matters more now? If you're an engineer that loves coding, you're in a tougher spot than you might realize. In this video, we cover: - Why writing code is "solved" but engineering isn't - Spec-driven development and how to get it started in your team - The "Dark Factory" and why code review is a huge bottleneck - Model vs harness: what matters more, and why - The unhealthy side of agentic coding If you write software for a living and you're trying to work out what your job becomes next, start here. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Coding Is No Longer Necessary 00:00:43 - Why "Software Development Is Already Solved" 00:02:57 - Should You Even Read the AI's Code? 00:05:05 - What Is a "Dark Factory"? 00:06:52 - If You Can Regenerate It, Why Care About Quality? 00:07:49 - Spec-Driven Development Explained 00:11:32 - Adopting Specs Without Starting From Scratch 00:13:23 - Model vs Harness: What Matters More? 00:17:27 - Is Your Harness the New IDE? 00:20:18 - Why Everyone Plateaus (and the Innovation Token) 00:22:50 - Where to Actually Spend Your Time 00:24:57 - The Unhealthy Side: "It's Free Cocaine" 00:28:00 - Is This Sustainable, or Just Subsidized? 00:30:33 - Should You Run Models Locally? 00:34:31 - Looping, Scale, and Automating Review 00:37:53 - What's Left for Engineers to Do? 00:39:13 - If You Love Writing Code, You're in Trouble 00:41:18 - Why Teams Are Getting Smaller 00:43:03 - What an "Agentic Company" Looks Like 00:46:25 - How to Start: Find Your Spark 00:50:13 - The One Habit That Keeps You Ahead Guests: Jeroen Gordijn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeroengordijn Jeroen Dee: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeroendee #AgenticEngineering #SoftwareEngineering #Agents

AI generates 10x more code, but your senior engineers still review it by hand and it's burning them out. Even Google admits code review is now the bottleneck nobody knows how to solve. Florian Buetow, AI engineer at Xebia, has been running experiments to eliminate the human from the review loop entirely, and what he found changes where engineers should focus their effort. In this episode, we cover: Why "stop doing code reviews" is a serious answer (and what replaces them) The guardrails that gave the most value: Semgrep rules, architectural unit tests, and stop hooks Why your harness matters more than the model How Amazon and Google police AI-generated code with policies AI burnout, cognitive debt, and "cognitive surrender": what stays your responsibility Step one for adopting agentic software engineering in your team this week Whether you're an individual developer drowning in AI-generated PRs or driving AI adoption across a large engineering org, you'll leave with concrete experiments to run. More from Florian: https://cracking-ai-engineering.com Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Intro 00:00:40 - Code Review Is Software Engineering's Biggest Bottleneck 00:01:57 - How Amazon and Big Tech Police AI-Generated Code 00:02:55 - Horizontal vs Vertical Scaling of AI Engineering 00:04:37 - Why "No Code Reviews" Might Be the Answer 00:05:22 - Engineering Environments That Give Agents Feedback 00:06:46 - Why the Harness Matters More Than the Model 00:07:21 - When Spec-Driven Development Failed and TDD Worked 00:10:06 - Stop Hooks, Ralph Loops, and Automated Feedback 00:11:30 - The Guardrails That Gave the Most Value 00:14:00 - Architectural Constraints That Keep AI Code Sane 00:15:07 - What Remains a Human Responsibility 00:17:33 - Why All the Hard Work Moves Upfront Now 00:18:47 - The Incredible Skill Junior Engineers Should Learn 00:20:26 - AI Burnout: Why Engineers Are Exhausted 00:22:42 - Cognitive Surrender: Letting the Agent Take Over 00:23:25 - The Hand Grenade Problem with AI at Work 00:24:08 - Outsourcing Code Review to AI Itself 00:26:39 - Teams That Fully Adopted Spec-Driven Development 00:29:01 - Can You Rebuild Software From Tests Alone? 00:30:27 - How to Experiment and Stay Ahead 00:33:15 - Spying on What Subagents Tell Each Other 00:33:59 - Step One: How to Start with Guardrails 00:36:08 - Data Mining Your Session Logs for Patterns 00:37:00 - Stuck With One Harness? Here's What to Do 00:38:28 - The One Experiment to Run This Week #softwareengineering #aicoding #codereview

Are you ready to adapt to the rapidly evolving rules of software development? In this deep dive, Logan Kilpatrick, Director and Engineer at Google DeepMind, breaks down how AI agents, advanced model-product symbiosis, and tools like Gemini 3.5 Flash are fundamentally shifting the engineering bottleneck. Learn how to maintain your competitive advantage by moving beyond the keyboard to focus on problem-solving, architectural taste, and system understanding. In this video, we cover: The changing role of the IDE and the rise of agent managers in code generation. Overcoming team bottlenecks in code review and CI/CD test execution execution loops. Why "agent coverage" and context integration are the next big tech stack metrics. Building a bulletproof software portfolio through permissionless open-source contributions. The critical difference between outsourcing intelligence versus outsourcing understanding. This episode is for software engineers, tech leads, and computer science students looking to future-proof their careers and reset their ambitions in the era of autonomous engineering agents. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Intro 00:00:40 - Code Review Is Software Engineering's Biggest Bottleneck 00:01:57 - How Amazon and Big Tech Police AI-Generated Code 00:02:55 - Horizontal vs Vertical Scaling of AI Engineering 00:04:37 - Why "No Code Reviews" Might Be the Answer 00:05:22 - Engineering Environments That Give Agents Feedback 00:06:46 - Why the Harness Matters More Than the Model 00:07:21 - When Spec-Driven Development Failed and TDD Worked 00:10:06 - Stop Hooks, Ralph Loops, and Automated Feedback 00:11:30 - The Guardrails That Gave the Most Value 00:14:00 - Architectural Constraints That Keep AI Code Sane 00:15:07 - What Remains a Human Responsibility 00:17:33 - Why All the Hard Work Moves Upfront Now 00:18:47 - The Incredible Skill Junior Engineers Should Learn 00:20:26 - AI Burnout: Why Engineers Are Exhausted 00:22:42 - Cognitive Surrender: Letting the Agent Take Over 00:23:25 - The Hand Grenade Problem with AI at Work 00:24:08 - Outsourcing Code Review to AI Itself 00:26:39 - Teams That Fully Adopted Spec-Driven Development 00:29:01 - Can You Rebuild Software From Tests Alone? 00:30:27 - How to Experiment and Stay Ahead 00:33:15 - Spying on What Subagents Tell Each Other 00:33:59 - Step One: How to Start with Guardrails 00:36:08 - Data Mining Your Session Logs for Patterns 00:37:00 - Stuck With One Harness? Here's What to Do 00:38:28 - The One Experiment to Run This Week #SoftwareEngineering #AIAgents #GoogleDeepMind

As AI agents transform software engineering, how do you leverage them without losing your coding skills or risking production disasters? In this episode, Google Cloud AI Director Addy Osmani breaks down the shift from babysitting basic models to mastering advanced agent harnesses. Discover how to safely delegate complex technical tasks while maintaining your human engineering identity and setting up secure boundaries for your AI. In this episode, we cover: Human Identity vs. Machine Identity: How to avoid the trap of "cognitive surrender" and keep your critical thinking sharp. Stopping the AI "Babysitting" Cycle: How to transition from constant manual oversight to secure agent governance. Rising Abstractions: Why agent harnesses (like Claude Code and Antigravity) are changing how software is built. The Verification Bottleneck: Why coding is easy, but verifying that your agent didn't ruin production is the real challenge. This episode is a must-watch for software engineers and tech leaders looking to integrate AI agents into their workflows safely and effectively. You’ll walk away with actionable frameworks to boost your development velocity without letting your own technical edge rot. Guest: Addy Osmani is a Director at Google Cloud AI, famous for his work on Google Chrome and focused on AI agents in software engineering. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Intro 00:00:45 - The Reality of "Babysitting" Your AI Agent Setup 00:01:16 - How to Stop Babysitting and Build Secure AI Agents 00:02:36 - The Dangerous Mistakes of Uncontrolled AI Experiments 00:03:39 - Rising Abstractions: From Code to Agent Harnesses 00:05:18 - Why You Should Delegate Technical Tasks to AI 00:07:05 - How to Choose the Best AI Agent Harness 00:08:31 - How to Manage Your Developer Innovation Budget 00:10:17 - Are We Losing Pair Programming to AI Agents? 00:12:14 - Cognitive Surrender: The Hidden Threat of Generated Code 00:13:40 - The Verification Bottleneck: How to Trust AI Code 00:15:59 - How to Safely Scale Your Personal AI Bandwidth #AIAgents #SoftwareEngineering #DeveloperProductivity

After 250 episodes of Beyond Coding, a pattern shows up again and again: the engineers who thrive aren't the ones chasing the newest tool or the cleanest code. They're the ones who learn fast, keep things simple, and understand the business they're building for. This special pulls the sharpest moments from recent guests into one conversation about what actually makes a great software engineer in 2026. We cover: Why learning is the only skill that outlives every tool, language, and platform How the best architects act more like scouts than cartographers Why "simple is complicated enough" beats clean code dogma at scale How to design systems that evolve instead of trying to predict 10 years out What junior engineers should actually do in the age of AI agents For software engineers who want to think clearer, build better, and grow into the kind of engineer companies can't replace. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Intro 00:00:17 - Why You Should Increase Your Breadth, Not Just Focus 00:02:16 - The Only Skill That Survives Every Tech Cycle 00:04:14 - Buzzwords Are Just Old Ideas in New Clothes 00:05:26 - What Clients Say vs What They Actually Want 00:06:45 - The Bad Architects Are Easier to Spot 00:08:50 - Why Good Engineers Use Boring Technology 00:11:40 - Stop Building for 100x Scale on Day One 00:13:13 - The Dogma of Clean Code Is Hurting You 00:15:15 - Simple Is Complicated Enough at Scale 00:16:28 - Design Only for the Next Order of Magnitude 00:18:19 - How to Talk Tech with Non-Technical Stakeholders 00:19:30 - The $50,000-Per-Hour Container Terminal Lesson 00:22:11 - Architects Are No Longer Cartographers, They're Scouts 00:25:18 - Start with a Question, Not an Answer 00:26:49 - Junior to Senior in the Age of AI Agents 00:27:29 - Don't Be a Fool with a Tool 00:29:43 - From Explicit to Implicit Knowledge Economy 00:30:38 - Use AI to Validate, Not to Generate #softwareengineering #engineeringcareer #softwarearchitecture

Reddit Reacts is back. I'm taking the most controversial takes on software engineering from Reddit and giving you my unfiltered perspective on what's happening, from juniors leveraging AI tools, to the culling of engineers who refuse to adapt, to whether you should take a gap year after a layoff. In this episode, we cover: How to become technically "cracked" and what really separates great engineers Why juniors learning with AI have an edge over 20-year veterans The future of writing code by hand (and why fulfillment is shifting) Vibe coding, security holes, and what happens after 6 months The brutal reality of layoffs, gap years, and AI-driven hiring If you're an engineer trying to figure out where this industry is going and how to stay competitive, this one is for you. Mentioned in the episode: ⁠ADP List⁠ - free mentorship from senior engineers Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Intro 00:00:54 - How to Become Technically Cracked in 2026 00:05:35 - Will Juniors Who Only Code with AI Get Stuck? 00:09:26 - Will Senior Engineers Stop Writing Code By Hand? 00:11:11 - I Vibe Coded for 6 Months and It's a Disaster 00:15:04 - Why Leaders Demand Screen Sharing on Incident Calls 00:17:34 - "I Don't Do Anything and Still Get Promoted" 00:20:33 - Have the Best Engineers Stopped Applying? 00:25:39 - The Future of Software Engineering in the AI Era 00:32:15 - Are Most Programmers Actually Bad? 00:34:58 - Should You Take a Gap Year After a Layoff? #softwareengineering #aicoding #techcareers

Most engineers are using AI coding tools without understanding what they actually are and it's costing them. Microsoft Certified Trainer Rob Bos has trained thousands of engineers on AI tooling, and he sees the same gaps in fundamentals show up again and again, regardless of seniority. This is what you need to know: What an LLM actually is (and why understanding this changes how you use it) Why prompt engineering isn't optional How AI magnifies your existing technical debt instead of fixing it The 6-month learning curve nobody warns you about Why your role as an engineer was never about writing code The environmental cost behind every prompt Whether you're skeptical of AI tools or already living in agent mode, these are the fundamentals that separate engineers who get real value from those who get burned by the hype. Connect with Rob: https://www.linkedin.com/in/bosrob References:Token tracker: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=RobBos.copilot-token-tracker Dev survey: https://www.activestate.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/ActiveState-Developer-Survey-2019-Open-Source-Runtime-Pains.pdf Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Intro 00:00:43 - The #1 Thing Engineers Get Wrong About AI 00:02:09 - How Much LLM Theory Do You Actually Need? 00:03:58 - Why Pair Programming Is Still the Best Way to Learn AI 00:05:26 - Why Rob Skips Tab Completion and Lives in Agent Mode 00:07:03 - The "AI Doesn't Increase Productivity" Debate 00:08:29 - Why Your Real Job Was Never Writing Code 00:09:14 - The 2-Hours-of-Coding Problem No One Talks About 00:11:02 - More Code = More Pressure on Your Review Process 00:12:21 - Why AI Magnifies Existing Technical Debt 00:13:39 - The Customer Who Couldn't Start AI With Developers Yet 00:15:11 - The Future Engineer: Reviewer, Not Writer 00:17:00 - Convincing the AI Skeptic Who Tried It Years Ago 00:19:17 - LLMs Explained Without Visuals (Attention & Semantics) 00:22:41 - Why Prompt Engineering Actually Matters 00:24:20 - From Zero to Hero: The 6-Month Learning Curve 00:26:18 - Is This Confrontational for 20-Year Veterans? 00:29:30 - Becoming a Better Engineer by Thinking in Systems 00:31:26 - Will AI Stop Working as Innovation Slows? 00:34:26 - The Lost Art of Pair Programming with AI 00:35:44 - Tribalism in AI Tools (And Why It's Pointless) 00:37:33 - Tool Agnostic: Start With the Foundations 00:39:40 - Is the IDE Still Relevant? 00:40:50 - The Bluescreen Story That Changed His Mind 00:41:47 - The Hidden Environmental Cost of AI Coding 00:44:15 - 36 Million Tokens in 30 Days: What Does It Mean? 00:45:47 - Running LLMs at the Edge to Cut the Footprint 00:46:48 - Why You Should Be Allowed to Wait Five Minutes Longer 00:47:05 - Outro #githubcopilot #aicoding #softwareengineering

Most engineers approach open source the wrong way. They write code, open a PR, and wonder why it never gets merged. Bruno Schaatsbergen, Terraform core contributor and ex-HashiCorp engineer, breaks down the real craft behind contributions that actually land, and why AI is quietly breaking the ecosystem we all depend on. In this episode, we cover: Why pull requests get ignored (and the counterintuitive fix) How AI slop is killing open source from the inside Using AI agents without losing your identity as an engineer Why open source beats a tailored resume in today's market How consistent contributions can reshape your entire career If you've ever wanted to contribute to open source but didn't know where to start, this episode gives you a clear perspective from someone who's been on both sides. Connect with Bruno: https://www.linkedin.com/in/bschaatsbergen OUTILNE 00:00:00 - Intro 00:01:04 - How Open Source Shaped My Entire Career 00:02:14 - Why I Take Pride in Every PR I Write 00:03:16 - Open Source vs Personal Projects: The Real Difference 00:04:18 - Why Your PRs Get Ignored (And How to Fix It) 00:05:41 - Know Your Audience: The Counterintuitive PR Hack 00:06:35 - Dealing With Imposter Syndrome as a Contributor 00:07:10 - Read Code Like a Writer Reads Books 00:09:31 - My First Contribution (And How It Changed My Career) 00:10:51 - Should You Contribute to Open Source Early in Your Career? 00:12:46 - The Dark Side: When Contributions Become Noise 00:13:44 - Killed With Kindness: The AI Slop Problem 00:16:17 - How Maintainers Are Fighting AI Slop 00:18:02 - How I Actually Use AI Agents in My Workflow 00:19:11 - Don't Outsource Your Thinking to AI 00:20:11 - Who's Liable for AI-Generated Code? 00:21:16 - Earned Rights: Why Trust Matters in Open Source 00:22:52 - How to Approach People at Tech Conferences 00:24:52 - Open Source Is Not a Democracy 00:26:04 - Why Open Source Beats a Tailored Resume 00:27:12 - Never Contribute With the Goal of Getting Hired 00:28:38 - The Real Reason Consistency Pays Off 00:29:30 - Admitting I'm a University Dropout 00:30:42 - Why I Haven't Contributed in Weeks (And That's Okay) 00:32:07 - The Trap of Chasing Contributor Rankings 00:34:32 - Open Source Lets You Work With Anyone in the World 00:35:52 - Final Advice: Don't Let AI Steal Your Identity

What separates software that survives from software nobody wants to touch? Nico Krijnen has spent 30 years building systems, coaching teams, and learning why some projects thrive while others quietly become the legacy code everyone avoids. In this episode, he shares why the real work starts after you ship, what actually turns a system into legacy, and why the knowledge in your team's heads matters more than the code itself. In this episode, we cover: Why production is where the real learning begins The team composition that consistently delivers results Peter Naur's Theory Building and why documentation alone falls short How knowledge leaving your team turns working systems into legacy Why assuming you're wrong leads to better architecture Whether you're a senior engineer rethinking how you build or earlier in your career trying to understand what really matters, this episode will change how you think about software that lasts. Connect with Nico: https://realworldarchitect.dev TIMESTAMPS 00:00:00 - Intro 00:01:17 - Why He Keeps Choosing Engineering Over Management 00:04:01 - Three Seniors Solved in Three Weeks What Management Couldn't 00:05:14 - The Signals You Miss When You're Not in the Team 00:06:26 - The #1 Skill Behind Every Successful Project 00:08:04 - Why Production Is the Starting Line, Not the Finish 00:10:13 - The Habit Most Teams Skip After Deploying 00:11:28 - Why the Best Teams Mix Designers and Engineers 00:14:36 - Finding the Right People for the Job at Hand 00:17:01 - What Juniors Bring That Seniors Can't 00:20:57 - How to Handle Ideas You Disagree With as a Senior 00:24:21 - A Simple Technique to Surface Everyone's Best Ideas 00:27:09 - What Makes a System Survive Long-Term 00:30:53 - What Actually Makes a System "Legacy" 00:35:01 - The Knowledge That Keeps Software Alive 00:36:06 - Peter Naur's Theory Building: Why Documentation Isn't Enough 00:40:06 - How Knowledge Loss Is Killing Your Codebase 00:42:42 - The Hidden Risk of AI Tools for Team Knowledge 00:48:14 - Why You Should Assume Everything You Build Is Wrong 00:51:31 - Make Hard Things Easy to Change #SoftwareEngineering #SystemDesign #TechPodcast

Suzanne Daniels is a Top Microsoft Advisor who works with CTOs and engineering leaders across EMEA on developer productivity, GitHub, and AI adoption. Her take: the industry is obsessing over coding speed, but that was only ever level one. The real shift is in who defines the solution, not who writes the code. In this episode, we cover: Why the "55x faster coding" marketing misses the point entirely The counterintuitive research showing junior engineers adopt AI faster than seniors "Coding is cheap, software is expensive" and what that means for your career How the boundary between product and engineering is disappearing Why most AI coding tools are 80% the same and what to focus on instead Whether you're early in career and struggling to land a role, or a senior engineer rethinking where your value lies, Suzanne breaks down what actually matters when the coding part becomes cheap. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Intro 00:01:15 - Is AI Productivity the Whole Story? 00:03:26 - Why Outcomes Matter More Than Code Output 00:04:13 - The Real Value Was Never in the Coding 00:06:06 - The Product-Engineering Boundary Is Disappearing 00:07:37 - Why Junior Engineers Are Actually in High Demand 00:09:41 - Research Says Juniors Adopt AI Faster Than Seniors 00:11:31 - The Rise of Comb-Shaped Engineers 00:12:32 - The Energy Juniors Bring That Teams Need 00:14:06 - How Seniors Codify Knowledge for Agents and Humans 00:16:35 - Advice for Early Career Engineers Right Now 00:19:04 - Old Principles Getting a New Polish 00:21:13 - Coding Is Cheap, Software Is Expensive 00:22:52 - Will Agentic Development Change Your Programming Language? 00:24:53 - What Even Is an Application in the Agent Era? 00:28:34 - The Authenticity Paradox of AI-Written Content 00:30:12 - Why Your AI Output Needs a Human Value Add 00:32:12 - Is Open Source at Risk Because of AI? 00:35:09 - When Your Favorite Tool Doesn't Follow You to the Next Job 00:36:45 - Most AI Coding Tools Are 80% the Same 00:38:15 - What Engineering Leaders Should Enable Beyond Licensing 00:42:58 - Should You Leave If Your Company Won't Let You Experiment? 00:45:16 - Platform Engineering as the Foundation for AI Adoption Guest: Suzanne Daniels https://www.linkedin.com/in/suzannedaniels #SoftwareEngineering #AICoding #BeyondCoding

The role of the software engineer is shifting from execution to orchestration, and it's happening faster than most of us realize. Dennis Vink, Principal Consultant at Xebia, breaks down how he approaches code modernization with AI, why fundamentals and system design matter more now than ever, and what the engineering role is actually becoming. In this episode, we cover: Why you need to mature your old codebase before you can migrate away from it How to prove feature parity between legacy and modern systems Why vibe coding without architecture knowledge gives you zero control The shift from execution-focused engineering to orchestration Why Dennis worries about the next generation of engineers Whether you're sitting on legacy code at work or wondering how your role as an engineer is evolving, this conversation will make you think about where you need to invest your time next. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Intro 00:00:51 - Dennis's Early AI Engineering Assignments 00:02:23 - Side Projects: Reviving a 20-Year-Old Game in Rust 00:04:36 - Why Vibe Coding Without Fundamentals Fails 00:05:15 - The Fundamentals You Need for Code Migration 00:06:45 - Proving Feature Parity with Automated Testing 00:08:12 - Writing Tests First as Risk Mitigation 00:10:13 - How Much Should You Care About Code Structure? 00:11:18 - Migrating in Small Pieces of Value 00:12:26 - Will Engineers Still Find Fulfillment in Building? 00:14:01 - How to Actually Start Side Projects (ADHD Brain) 00:15:34 - Why Pivoting Is No Longer Painful 00:16:12 - Prompting as the New Bottleneck 00:17:23 - Parallelizing Work Across Projects 00:19:08 - Why System Design Is the #1 Audience Demand 00:20:19 - AI as a Differentiator for Strong Architects 00:21:11 - Why the New Generation Should Worry 00:23:01 - Are Bootcamps Still Worth It? 00:25:15 - The Shift from Collaboration to Business Understanding 00:27:56 - Infrastructure as a Core Competency Bet 00:30:15 - Deterministic vs Non-Deterministic Code Generation 00:32:16 - Can This Approach Scale to Million-Line Codebases? 00:34:20 - Why a Finger-Snap Migration Would Scare You 00:37:01 - Where to Start with Your Own Legacy Codebase 00:38:43 - Which Languages Do AI Models Struggle With? 00:40:24 - Building Around Hallucination with Scaffolding 00:42:30 - Spec-Driven Development as the Future Way of Working 00:43:30 - Turning a Non-Technical Colleague into a "Developer" in an Hour 00:46:21 - When the House Is on Fire, That's When You Need Real Engineers Projects we discussed: Agent designer - hurozo.com Game project - Zorlore.com ( https://github.com/zorlore/ ) Vibe coded solar system simulation - spacehaste.com #SoftwareEngineering #SystemDesign #AIEngineering

Most senior engineers don't realize they're stuck until it's too late. The longer you stay, the more people around you have already decided who you are and what you're for. Ian Miell, CTO at Container Solutions, breaks down why this happens and how understanding the system around you is the first step to growing beyond it. In this episode, we cover: Why staying too long gets you put in a box (and how to escape it) How your software architecture is shaped by money flows The 30% rule: why you should feel uncomfortable at work and what it means if you don't How to pitch to senior leadership and actually get buy-in Why AI makes distribution the real challenge, not building If you're a senior engineer trying to grow beyond your current ceiling, this one is worth your time. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Intro 00:00:42 - How to Pitch to Senior Leadership and Get Buy-In 00:03:26 - Why You Should Feel Uncomfortable 30% of the Time 00:06:33 - How to Break Through a Seniority Ceiling 00:08:24 - The Burden of Context: Why Being the Go-To Person Traps You 00:10:16 - How Ian Became CTO Without Trying To 00:13:40 - Why a CTO's Job Is Mostly Coaching Now 00:18:20 - Understanding Incentives: The Key to Navigating Any Org 00:23:08 - Startups vs. Large Companies: Completely Different Rules 00:25:00 - Why AI Makes Distribution the Real Problem, Not Building 00:28:16 - The Hidden Maintenance Risk of Vibe-Coded Software 00:30:13 - Security and Compliance: More Nuanced Than Engineers Think 00:36:54 - Where "Architecture Follows the Money" Came From 00:42:36 - The Wrong Number of Customers: A Systems Thinking Story 00:47:23 - Why Engineers Think Individually Instead of Systemically 00:51:53 - How to Start Thinking in Systems 00:57:50 - How to Create Cross-Pollination in Consulting Teams 00:59:39 - What CTOs Actually Look for When Hiring 01:00:34 - Outro #softwareengineering #systemsthinking #careergrowth

Most architects stop coding... and that's exactly where they lose their edge. Dennis Doomen has been a hands-on coding architect for 30 years, and his take is blunt: if you're not in the code, you can't make good architectural decisions. Period. In this episode, we get into the real causes of codebase rot, why dogmatic pattern-following destroys teams, how Dennis uses AI tools to build open source projects without compromising his standards, and why documentation and decision records might be the most underrated investment a software team can make. This one is for software engineers and architects who want to stay sharp, stay relevant, and build systems that actually last. 00:00:00 - Intro 00:01:05 - Why Dennis Refuses to Stop Coding (After 30 Years) 00:02:54 - The Only Way to Be an Effective Software Architect 00:04:43 - What Happens When Teams Copy Patterns Without Understanding Them 00:06:23 - Software Engineering Is About Battling Complexity 00:08:20 - When to Break Consistency to Reduce Complexity 00:09:24 - The Problem with Overzealous SOLID Principles 00:11:06 - The Future Where We Don't Care About Code Anymore 00:12:07 - How Dennis Built an Open Source Library with GitHub Copilot 00:14:18 - Accepting AI-Generated Code That Doesn't Meet Your Standards 00:16:39 - How to Use AI Without Losing Code Quality 00:17:41 - The Execution Is Accelerating — What Actually Matters Now 00:20:19 - Why Tests Are Your Safety Net in an AI-First World 00:23:44 - Lessons Learned from Letting AI Run Unsupervised 00:26:46 - Should Teams Standardize Which AI Tool They Use? 00:27:32 - Junior Devs and AI: Learning Skills vs. Speed 00:29:21 - How to Stay Curious and Critical in an AI-Assisted Team 00:33:43 - How to Build a Software Engineer from Scratch Today 00:34:38 - Dennis's Emoji-Based Pull Request Review System 00:36:45 - What AI Still Can't Do: Holistic Architectural Thinking 00:38:38 - Why Your Git History Is More Valuable Than You Think 00:40:44 - Decision Records: The Architecture Investment That Pays Off 00:43:16 - When Documentation Saved Dennis from a Bad Management Decision 00:44:47 - The Tailwind Layoffs and the Open Source Business Model Crisis 00:46:27 - Guidelines for Consuming Open Source Responsibly 00:49:51 - Why You Should Open Source Your Own Projects Guest: Dennis Doomen - Microsoft MVP, open source creator (FluentAssertions and more), and coding architect at Aviva Solutions. #softwaredevelopment #softwarearchitecture #softwareengineering

Sendil Nellaiyapen, Engineering Manager at Uber, has built systems that scale to millions of users. In this episode he shares what most engineers get wrong about both system design and the move into engineering management In this episode, we cover: Ingredients for designing systems that scale to millions of users How to know when to compromise on architecture The trade-offs of going from IC to engineering manager and why the role is harder than it looks How to handle opinionated engineers, set team guardrails, and build high-performing engineering culture Whether you're a senior engineer weighing the move into management, or already leading teams and looking to sharpen your system design thinking, this one's for you. OUTLINE: 00:00:00 - Intro 00:01:05 - The Ingredients for Building Systems at Scale 00:02:23 - When to Compromise on Your Foundation 00:03:42 - Scaling from 2,000 to 5 Million Users 00:06:37 - Why Clarity Beats Seniority Every Time 00:08:27 - The Danger of Muscle Memory in Engineering 00:10:25 - MVP Mindset: What You Can and Can't Compromise 00:13:22 - How High-Performing Teams Handle Growing Complexity 00:15:04 - Who Owns the Assumptions? Shared Team Responsibility 00:17:04 - Building Open Frameworks Instead of Closed Rules 00:19:53 - Latency Is Overrated (Here's Why) 00:22:52 - Recipes for Disaster: The Biggest System Design Pitfalls 00:24:17 - The Scala Horror Story: When Elegance Kills Velocity 00:26:52 - How to Handle Opinionated Engineers on Your Team 00:29:03 - Setting Guardrails: The Manager's Design Responsibility 00:32:01 - The Hardest Trade-Off Going from IC to Engineering Manager 00:34:35 - Should Great Engineers Stay IC or Go into Management? 00:37:11 - BFS vs DFS Engineers: Which Type Makes a Better Manager? 00:39:05 - The Real Cost of Becoming a Manager (And Why It's Worth It) 00:41:52 - Outro #systemdesign #engineeringmanager #softwareengineering